If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research that prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.
However, because what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe range from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the farther the tower is.
Although this may sound like a good idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that those living within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those living further away from the antennas.
This study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communications, may be absorbed by the body's outer layer of skin. what is a safe distance from a cell tower is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ of the human body and is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. They include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of modulated RF signals and the consequences of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC limit their limit of exposure to the local SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.