If you've ever walked through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on research which show that the energy of RF can cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower can result in various potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, then you've probably realized that the safest location from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away your location from the tower.
While it sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those who were distance from them.
But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the largest organ of the human body. It is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiation is safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effects of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore what is a safe distance from a cell tower shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.