Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.



But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to many possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis and cataracts, and skin cancer.

Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe range from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther you are from it.

While this sounds like something that's good, the reality is that those living close to towers might be more vulnerable to health issues. For  https://www.pearltrees.com/reasonviola4/item515575107 , a study from 2014 in India discovered that people living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who were far from antennas.

what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communication, can penetrate the body's outer layer of skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a shield against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances.  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  is also the biggest organ in the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on several assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This assumption does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the consequences of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure guidelines.

In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of radiation exposure. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.