If you've ever walked through a city and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
These smaller towers are replacing larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still cause problems for people.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
Browse this site
Have you ever used a cell phone, then you've probably realized that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further your location from the tower.
While this sounds like a good idea however, those living close to towers could be more prone to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who were far from antennas.
But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. safe distance to live from cell phone tower have shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is because the RF radiation utilized in wireless communications, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin serves as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the most important organ of the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiations are not harmful due to minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
This also overlooks the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effect of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs that are based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This could result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.