If you've ever been through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
They are replacing larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, but not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
In the event that you've used mobile phone, you probably know that a safe distance from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower.
While this sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that those living close to towers could be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
This study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. what is a safe distance from a cell tower has demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.
This is because radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ in the human body, and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effects of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly safe distance from cell tower is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.