What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell System?

· 3 min read
What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell System?

If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could cause problems for people.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF can cause harm to health.

what is a safe distance from a cell tower  (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

In the event that you've used mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest distance from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further you are from it.

While this sounds like a good idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those living further far from antennas.

This study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. This is vital to be aware of since the skin functions as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ of the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.


The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the incorrect assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).

This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore  https://blogfreely.net/whitefaucet2/what-is-the-safest-distance-from-the-5g-cell-tower  shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This could result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For  safe distance from cell tower , exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.